Though it is called a "blog," this is missing some of the important qualities that define a blog. There is no commenting system, so blogger/reader interaction is heavily impaired. This also means that readers cannot discuss their opinions on a specific blog post very easily. Also, the authors are all anonymous, and the blog doesn't link to other blogs as independent ones always do. Despite the fact that National Review is known for being a conservative publication, this blog doesn't seem too biased, mainly because it's more of a syndication for their news articles than an actual blog.
[link]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment